Is that skill safe? Look it up.
1,394 public agent skills with a security grade and content hash, rescanned every night.
- C
libafl
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Builds custom fuzzers with LibAFL, the modular Rust fuzzing library. Covers composing observers, feedbacks, mutators, schedulers, and executors into a fuzzer for targets the standard tools do not fit. Use when writing a bespoke fuzzer or mutator, fuzzing a non-standard target or architecture, implementing a fuzzing research idea, or when libFuzzer and AFL++ lack the control you need.
1 high1 low - A
libfuzzer
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Sets up and runs libFuzzer, the coverage-guided fuzzer built into LLVM, on C/C++ code that compiles with Clang. Covers harness structure, -fsanitize=fuzzer builds, corpus and dictionary management, sanitizer integration, and campaign triage. Use when writing or debugging an LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput harness, starting fuzzing on a C/C++ library, choosing between libFuzzer and AFL++, or working out why a libFuzzer run finds nothing.
No security findings - A
mermaid-to-proverif
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Translates Mermaid sequenceDiagrams describing cryptographic protocols into ProVerif formal verification models (.pv files). Use when generating a ProVerif model, formally verifying a protocol, converting a Mermaid diagram to ProVerif, verifying protocol security properties (secrecy, authentication, forward secrecy), checking for replay attacks, or producing a .pv file from a sequence diagram.
No security findings - A
modern-cpp
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Guides C++ code toward modern idioms (C++20/23/26). Use when writing new C++ code, modernizing legacy patterns, or working on security-critical C++. Replaces raw pointers with smart pointers, SFINAE with concepts, printf with std::print, error codes with std::expected.
No security findings - A
modern-python
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Configures Python projects with modern tooling (uv, ruff, ty). Use when creating projects, writing standalone scripts, or migrating from pip/Poetry/mypy/black.
2 medium1 low - A
mutation-testing
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Configures mewt or muton campaigns, analyzes surviving mutants, and investigates bugs exposed by testing gaps. Use when setting up mutation testing, reviewing campaign results, identifying equivalent mutants, or finding bugs from surviving mutations.
1 medium - A
open-sourcing
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
This skill should be used when the user asks to "open source this project", "prepare this repository for public release", "make this repo public", "check open-source readiness", "choose a license for this project", or "set up release automation" ahead of a public launch. Provides a release-readiness workflow covering secrets hygiene, licensing, documentation, CI, and language-specific packaging.
No security findings - A
ossfuzz
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Enrolls a project in OSS-Fuzz, Google's free continuous fuzzing service for open source, and drives it locally. Covers project.yaml, Dockerfile and build.sh setup, the helper scripts, reproducing OSS-Fuzz crash reports, and the acceptance criteria. Use when setting up continuous fuzzing for an open-source project, reproducing an OSS-Fuzz bug report, or testing an OSS-Fuzz build before submitting it.
No security findings - A
panel-review
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Reviews a code target by launching a panel of specialist auditor agents and merging their reports. Use when asked to run a panel review.
No security findings - A
post-patch-validation
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Validates security patches with reproducible baseline-versus-patched evidence, including original exploits, root-cause variants, behavior preservation, regressions, and newly introduced security failures. Use after a patch exists and before accepting, merging, or reporting it as fixed; also use when an AI-generated patch, remediation commit, pull request, or proposed upstream fix needs adversarial post-patch validation across any language.
1 medium - A
pr-improver
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over the current branch's changes until a PR review comes back clean, scoped mechanically to the directories the branch touched. Reviews are performed by an installed PR-review skill (default: pr-review-toolkit's review-pr). Use to fix review findings on a branch before opening or updating a pull request ('clean up this branch', 'fix this PR until review passes', 'run review-and-fix on my changes'). NOT for a one-time review — run the PR-review skill directly.
1 medium - A
property-based-testing
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Writes, reviews, and debugs property-based tests — Hypothesis, fast-check, proptest, jqwik, rapid, and Echidna or Medusa for Solidity invariants. Use whenever tests should cover a whole input domain instead of a hand-picked list of examples: encode/decode and serialize/deserialize pairs, parsers, canonicalizers and normalizers, validators, numeric and Decimal types, comparators and sort order, data structures, and smart-contract state invariants. Also use when adding cases to an existing @given, fast-check, or proptest suite, when judging whether existing property tests assert anything real, and when a generator has shrunk a counterexample and you need to tell a wrong property from a genuine bug. Not for coverage-guided binary fuzzing (libFuzzer, AFL), mutation-testing campaigns, static analysis, benchmarking, or end-to-end UI tests.
No security findings - A
review-pr
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Reviews the current branch's changes against its base branch as a pull request: correctness of new and modified code, test coverage for it, and documentation accuracy. Use when asked to review a branch, a diff, or a pull request.
1 medium - A
review-walkthrough
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Generates an interactive HTML walkthrough for reviewing code changes. Use only when explicitly called.
No security findings - A
rust-review
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Performs comprehensive Rust security review for safe/unsafe boundary issues, memory safety in unsafe blocks, concurrency hazards, panic-induced DoS, FFI safety, and async runtime mistakes. Use when auditing Rust crates, services, or libraries — particularly those with `unsafe`, FFI, or concurrent code.
1 medium - A
ruzzy
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Sets up and runs Ruzzy, Trail of Bits' coverage-guided Ruby fuzzer and the only production-ready one for the language. Covers harness structure, fuzzing pure Ruby and the native C extensions in gems, and sanitizer builds. Use when fuzzing a Ruby library or gem, testing a Ruby C extension for memory safety, or asking how to fuzz Ruby at all.
No security findings - A
sarif-parsing
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Parses and processes SARIF files from static analysis tools like CodeQL, Semgrep, or other scanners. Triggers on "parse sarif", "read scan results", "aggregate findings", "deduplicate alerts", or "process sarif output". Handles filtering, deduplication, format conversion, and CI/CD integration of SARIF data. Does NOT run scans — use the Semgrep or CodeQL skills for that.
1 medium1 low - B
second-opinion
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Gets independent code reviews from Codex or Antigravity for uncommitted changes, branch diffs, and commits. Use when the user requests an external review, a second opinion on code, a codex review, a gemini review, an antigravity review, or /second-opinion.
2 medium1 low - A
secure-workflow-guide
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Guides through Trail of Bits' 5-step secure development workflow. Runs Slither scans, checks special features (upgradeability/ERC conformance/token integration), generates visual security diagrams, helps document security properties for fuzzing/verification, and reviews manual security areas. Use when securing a smart contract end to end rather than hunting one bug, checking a project on every check-in or before deployment, triaging a Slither report, or asking where to start on smart contract security.
No security findings - A
semgrep
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Runs a Semgrep security scan over a codebase: detects languages, selects rulesets, presents the plan for explicit approval, then runs every approved ruleset through scripts/run-scans.sh, which batches the semgrep processes and writes scans.json, and merges the output to SARIF. Supports two scan modes, "run all" for full ruleset coverage and "important only" for security findings at medium-to-high confidence and impact. Uses Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis when it is available. Use when asked to scan code for vulnerabilities, run a security audit with Semgrep, find bugs, or perform static analysis. For the same scan without the approval gate, use the /static-analysis:semgrep-scan workflow.
1 medium1 low - B
semgrep-rule-creator
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Creates custom Semgrep rules for detecting security vulnerabilities, bug patterns, and code patterns. Use when writing Semgrep rules or building custom static analysis detections.
6 medium1 low - A
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
1 medium2 low - B
sharp-edges
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Identifies error-prone APIs, dangerous configurations, and footgun designs that enable security mistakes. Use when reviewing API designs, configuration schemas, cryptographic library ergonomics, or evaluating whether code follows 'secure by default' and 'pit of success' principles. Triggers: footgun, misuse-resistant, secure defaults, API usability, dangerous configuration.
3 medium15 low - A
skill-improver
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review — use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.
1 medium - C
slicing-code-context
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Selects bounded, graph-informed source slices with Trailmark and delegates focused code analysis or patch-proposal work to a smaller subagent. Use when offloading function-, class-, caller-, callee-, call-path-, entrypoint-, or line-focused code tasks to constrained or locally hosted models without exposing the full repository.
1 high - A
solana-vulnerability-scanner
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Scans Solana programs for 6 critical vulnerabilities including arbitrary CPI, improper PDA validation, missing signer/ownership checks, and sysvar spoofing. Use when auditing Solana/Anchor programs.
No security findings - A
spec-to-code-compliance
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Check code against the documentation that specifies it - which requirements hold, which the code contradicts, which are absent, and what the code does that no document mentions. Use when comparing an implementation against a whitepaper, protocol spec, or design document.
2 medium - A
substrate-vulnerability-scanner
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Scans Substrate/Polkadot pallets for 7 critical vulnerabilities including arithmetic overflow, panic DoS, incorrect weights, and bad origin checks. Use when auditing Substrate runtimes or FRAME pallets.
No security findings - A
supply-chain-risk-auditor
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Audits a project's dependencies for supply-chain risk: version-matched advisories for direct dependencies and the full lockfile tree, abandoned or archived upstreams, npm publisher concentration, and install-time script execution. Use when asked to audit dependencies, assess supply-chain or third-party package risk, or review a dependency tree before an engagement.
1 medium - A
testing-handbook-generator
7.6ktrailofbits/skills
Generates Claude Code skills from the Trail of Bits Testing Handbook (appsec.guide), analyzing handbook pages and emitting SKILL.md files with the structure each skill type requires. Use when creating or refreshing a skill from handbook content, or when the user names the testing handbook or appsec.guide. Not for answering security testing questions — the generated skills cover those.
No security findings